Okada Fine Art Limited 岡田藝琳有限公司
BB v KO
HK Court of First Instance, 20-Oct-2023
This is Bartlit Beck LLP v Kazuo Okada. The law firm, pursuing its fees from a US arbitration award, obtains an order for receivers to be appointed over Mr Okada's shares in Okada Fine Art Ltd (HK), which owns artworks in the Okada Museum of Art in Hakone, Japan. The artwork was purportedly valued at HK$2.7bn in 2014.
HK Court of First Instance, 20-Oct-2023
This is Bartlit Beck LLP v Kazuo Okada. The law firm, pursuing its fees from a US arbitration award, obtains an order for receivers to be appointed over Mr Okada's shares in Okada Fine Art Ltd (HK), which owns artworks in the Okada Museum of Art in Hakone, Japan. The artwork was purportedly valued at HK$2.7bn in 2014.
BB v KO
HK Court of First Instance, 17-Oct-2023
The parties are obviously Bartlit Beck LLP and Kazuo Okada. The law firm seeks enforcement of an arbitration award, upheld in the US Court of Appeals (on a named basis) for its fees after representing Universal Entertainment Corp in its dispute with Wynn Resorts. Mr Okada seeks an extension of time to set aside the HK enforcement order. His application is dismissed.
HK Court of First Instance, 17-Oct-2023
The parties are obviously Bartlit Beck LLP and Kazuo Okada. The law firm seeks enforcement of an arbitration award, upheld in the US Court of Appeals (on a named basis) for its fees after representing Universal Entertainment Corp in its dispute with Wynn Resorts. Mr Okada seeks an extension of time to set aside the HK enforcement order. His application is dismissed.
Universal Entertainment Corp & Tiger Resort Asia Ltd v Kazuo Okada
HK Court of First Instance, 17-Nov-2021
Mr Okada'a application for an order that his costs in 2 previous judgments in 202 be paid by the plaintiffs "forthwith" is dismissed.
HK Court of First Instance, 17-Nov-2021
Mr Okada'a application for an order that his costs in 2 previous judgments in 202 be paid by the plaintiffs "forthwith" is dismissed.
Universal Entertainment Corp & Tiger Resort Asia Ltd v Kazuo Okada
HK Court of Appeal, 2-Dec-2020
The application for leave to appeal against refusal of a Mareva injunction by the court below is dismissed as being "totally without merit".
HK Court of Appeal, 2-Dec-2020
The application for leave to appeal against refusal of a Mareva injunction by the court below is dismissed as being "totally without merit".
Universal Entertainment Corp & Tiger Resort Asia Ltd v Kazuo Okada
HK Court of First Instance, 18-Sep-2020
Leave to appeal against the dismissal of the application for a Mareva injunction is refused.
HK Court of First Instance, 18-Sep-2020
Leave to appeal against the dismissal of the application for a Mareva injunction is refused.
Universal Entertainment Corp & Tiger Resort Asia Ltd v Kazuo Okada
HK Court of First Instance, 17-Jul-2020
The application for a Mareva injunction is dismissed. There is a good arguable case on liability, but not on the quantum claimed, relating to cost overruns in the Philippine casino project.
HK Court of First Instance, 17-Jul-2020
The application for a Mareva injunction is dismissed. There is a good arguable case on liability, but not on the quantum claimed, relating to cost overruns in the Philippine casino project.
Universal Entertainment Corp & Tiger Resort Asia Ltd v Kazuo Okada
HK Court of First Instance, 22-Apr-2020
HK Court of First Instance, 22-Apr-2020
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site to a friend
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy