China Medical Technologies, Inc.
China Medical Technologies, Inc v the partners of KPMG HK
HK Court of First Instance, 9-Jan-2019
And the moral of the story is: if you don't want personal liability for the work of your partners, then don't practice as a partnership; incorporate.
HK Court of First Instance, 9-Jan-2019
And the moral of the story is: if you don't want personal liability for the work of your partners, then don't practice as a partnership; incorporate.
Ex-CEO and CFO of China Medical Technologies charged in US$400m fraud
US Department of Justice, 20-Mar-2017
US Department of Justice, 20-Mar-2017
China Medical Technologies, Inc. v KPMG
HK Court of First Instance, 12-Jan-2017
The liquidators continue their struggle to extract information from KPMG, which claims "state secrets" prevent it from co-operating.
HK Court of First Instance, 12-Jan-2017
The liquidators continue their struggle to extract information from KPMG, which claims "state secrets" prevent it from co-operating.
China Medical Technologies, Inc. v BOCHK & Bank of East Asia
HK Court of First Instance, 15-Dec-2015
HK Court of First Instance, 15-Dec-2015
Re China Medical Technologies, Inc.
HK Court of First Instance, 2-Oct-2015
Justice Jonathan Harris rules that the audit committee has no separate legal status from the company (of which its members are directors), and that the liquidator, having stepped into the shoes of the company, has the right to assert or waive privilege over documents held by Freshfields, which was appointed by the AC to investigate complaints.
HK Court of First Instance, 2-Oct-2015
Justice Jonathan Harris rules that the audit committee has no separate legal status from the company (of which its members are directors), and that the liquidator, having stepped into the shoes of the company, has the right to assert or waive privilege over documents held by Freshfields, which was appointed by the AC to investigate complaints.
Re China Medical Technologies, Inc. - redactio ad absurdum?
HK Court of First Instance, 19-Aug-2015
Rather absurdly, this judgment is so heavily redacted that the name of the company, stated in other judgments in this case, is given as "X" and none of the legal representatives is named.
HK Court of First Instance, 19-Aug-2015
Rather absurdly, this judgment is so heavily redacted that the name of the company, stated in other judgments in this case, is given as "X" and none of the legal representatives is named.
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site to a friend
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy