Chow, Anderson Ka Ming 周家明
Leslie Grant Horsfield & family v CE of HKSAR
HK Court of First Instance, 22-May-2020
The applicants, HK Permanent Residents arriving from South Africa, unsuccessfully seek release from inbound quarantine.
HK Court of First Instance, 22-May-2020
The applicants, HK Permanent Residents arriving from South Africa, unsuccessfully seek release from inbound quarantine.
Syed Agha Raza Shah v Director of Health
HK Court of First Instance, 13-May-2020
The applicant, a HK Permanent Resident returning from Pakistan, fails to obtain release from government quarantine to serve home quarantine instead, an option afforded to arrivals from certain other countries with high rates of COVID-19 infection.
HK Court of First Instance, 13-May-2020
The applicant, a HK Permanent Resident returning from Pakistan, fails to obtain release from government quarantine to serve home quarantine instead, an option afforded to arrivals from certain other countries with high rates of COVID-19 infection.
24 legislators v CE in Council & others
HK Court of First Instance, 22-Nov-2019
The judges decline to grant a Temporary Validity Order or a Suspension Order, but grant A 7-day interim suspension order to give time for the respondents to apply to the Court of Appeal for interim relief.
HK Court of First Instance, 22-Nov-2019
The judges decline to grant a Temporary Validity Order or a Suspension Order, but grant A 7-day interim suspension order to give time for the respondents to apply to the Court of Appeal for interim relief.
24 legislators v CE in Council & others
HK Court of First Instance, 18-Nov-2019
Justices Anderson Chow and Godfrey Lam rule that the Emergency Regulations Ordinance, in cases of public danger, is unconstitutional; the CE cannot bypass LegCo and make laws on her own. They also rule that the anti-mask law, even if passed by LegCo, would be unconstitutional except for the subsection outlawing masks in unlawful assemblies.
HK Court of First Instance, 18-Nov-2019
Justices Anderson Chow and Godfrey Lam rule that the Emergency Regulations Ordinance, in cases of public danger, is unconstitutional; the CE cannot bypass LegCo and make laws on her own. They also rule that the anti-mask law, even if passed by LegCo, would be unconstitutional except for the subsection outlawing masks in unlawful assemblies.
ERO: one judicial review, two judges
Webb-site has learned that in a very rare move, the Chief Justice has directed that 2 judges sit together in the Court of First Instance to hear the judicial review of the Chief Executive's use of the Emergency Regulations Ordinance. (16-Oct-2019)
Webb-site has learned that in a very rare move, the Chief Justice has directed that 2 judges sit together in the Court of First Instance to hear the judicial review of the Chief Executive's use of the Emergency Regulations Ordinance. (16-Oct-2019)
Agnes Chow Ting v Returning Officer and Au Nok Hin
HK Court of First Instance, 2-Sep-2019
Mr Au's election is nullified because Ms Chow was not given the right to be heard before the Returning Officer disqualified her on the ground that, although she signed the required declaration that she would uphold the Basic Law, the RO didn't believe her. If the judgment is not successfully appealed then there will be a by-election on HK Island. The Court maintains that the Returning Officer must still filter candidates by second-guessing their declaration, following the NPCSC interpretation of 7-Nov-2016.
HK Court of First Instance, 2-Sep-2019
Mr Au's election is nullified because Ms Chow was not given the right to be heard before the Returning Officer disqualified her on the ground that, although she signed the required declaration that she would uphold the Basic Law, the RO didn't believe her. If the judgment is not successfully appealed then there will be a by-election on HK Island. The Court maintains that the Returning Officer must still filter candidates by second-guessing their declaration, following the NPCSC interpretation of 7-Nov-2016.
Re Yee Tsim Choi and M Success Finance Ltd
HK Court of First Instance, 30-Mar-2016
The plaintiff and defendant are presumably Yee Tsim Choi and M Success Finance Ltd respectively, although the judgment omits to say so. Judge Anderson Chow rules that the defendant's attempt to register an unsecured loan (to the plaintiff's ex-husband) against the property at the Land Registry is "totally unjustified" and orders it removed. The lender is a subsidiary of Roma Group Ltd (8072).
HK Court of First Instance, 30-Mar-2016
The plaintiff and defendant are presumably Yee Tsim Choi and M Success Finance Ltd respectively, although the judgment omits to say so. Judge Anderson Chow rules that the defendant's attempt to register an unsecured loan (to the plaintiff's ex-husband) against the property at the Land Registry is "totally unjustified" and orders it removed. The lender is a subsidiary of Roma Group Ltd (8072).
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site to a friend
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy